Nope, not for reason. It violates a number of communication mechanisms. It rubs the wrong way because humans are very good at determining genuine from ingenuity.
If I had to guess, it's a decision made by executives who want staff to engage with customers but don't want to meaningfully invest in making that happen. It's a weird half-commit that, as you guys said, just shows that the company doesnβt care.
This is why investors think humans can be replaced with bots. Sure, if you force people to act like bots, it's probably cheaper to just let bots do the work. But the wasted human connection is rather tragic
I agree fully but also: its genuinely kinda hard to be consistently interesting on replies on 5 star reviews
like a 4 star review? a 2 star review? I can make that reply more interesting than anything else on the landing page